IRS Letter Example #1
In one case the taxpayer had
received a 1099-MISC from a Fortune 500 Company for payments he
received as a result of a legal action. He properly claimed the
income and did not deduct any expenses against the income. The IRS sent a
letter to the taxpayer and proposed an adjustment to his tax return
that would have caused him to owe approximately $3,000 unless he
could prove that it should not be subject to self-employment tax.
My first thought was, if the IRS
wants to question whether this taxpayers' income was reported on the
correct 1099 form, why not contact the issuer of the document? The
company would have issued a Form 1099-NEC (NEC=non-employee
compensation, or box 7 on the MISC, there's probably several million
of these forms issued each year) if the taxpayer had performed services for the
company. The issuer of the 1099 would be in a better position to
answer any questions about the 1099.
There may be 300,000 recipients
of 1099-MISC's and only 1,000 issuers (may be 10 or 20 times this
number, but the ratio is still there). To contact the issuers and insure
that they know when to issue a 1099-MISC (or box 3) versus a 1099-NEC
(box 7) would be
a lot less work, more productive and the 1,000 companies should be
in a better position to deal with the issues and expense involved.
Instead, the IRS takes a
"shotgun" approach. They send out 300,000 notices to recipients of
1099-MISC's instead of 1,000 letters to the issuers of the 1099's. Many
of the recipients of the IRS letters will simply pay up instead of
fighting it because; they are afraid of the IRS, they are uneducated
when it comes to the tax law and because it may be less expensive to
pay rather than fight. This is a gross injustice to the taxpaying
public.
I also have to think that the IRS
fully understands that the little taxpayer with $26,000 of income
that prepared his own return is not as well equipped to deal with
them as the Fortune 500 Company with billions in revenues and well
educated CPA's and attorneys on staff.
IRS Letter Example #2
The taxpayer did not receive a
1099, but reported $30,000 of miscellaneous income not subject to
self-employment tax and claimed no deduction for expenses related to
the income. The monies were received by the taxpayer
as a result of her acting as Conservator for an incapacitated
relative. She provided care for this individual in her home.
The Answer to the Self-Employment
Tax Issue
The Internal Revenue Code clearly
states that "an individual must carry on a trade or business,
either as an individual or as a member of a partnership or limited
liability company treated as a partnership, to have net earnings
from self-employment".
In addition, the code states, "thus,
a person whose activities do not rise to the level of a trade or
business for purposes of deducting trade or business expenses is not
engaged in a trade or business for purposes of the self-employment
tax".
In both cases referenced here the
taxpayers received income that was NOT from a trade or
business. The key to defending these cases rested with the fact that
in order for income to be subject to self-employment tax, the income
must be derived from a trade or business. Whether a particular
activity is a trade or business is a question of fact. An activity
is generally considered a trade or business if it is engaged in
regularly and for profit. Whether the taxpayer holds him or herself
out to the public as providing goods or services is also a factor.
Clearly in both cases the
taxpayers were not involved in a trade or business and did not hold
themselves out to the public as providing goods or services.
What Should I Do If I Receive a Letter From The IRS?
If you receive a letter from the
IRS that proposes adjustments or changes to your tax return, you
really should consult an EA, CPA or attorney, unless you fully
understand the technical aspects of the issues. Quite often we see
IRS letters that simply require a written response explaining the
facts in order to resolve the matter. The IRS will send a follow up
letter accepting the explanation and withdrawing their proposed
adjustment.
Most people don't realize that
more times than not, the IRS letter is computer generated (a human
being has not reviewed the issues prior to the computer spitting out
a letter to the taxpayer). I believe the IRS spent $9 Billion
Dollars on their computer systems in the last ten years, and as good
as the system is (and it is good), it's not always correct.
More About IRS Letters
If you have an IRS letter, look
in the upper right corner for the letter or notice designation. If
it reads "CP-2000" then you know you have a computer-generated IRS
letter that will either propose an adjustment, question an item on
the return or ask why the computer did not find an item on the
return. In the case of the latter, the item the computer is looking
for (because it was reported to them by a third party) may actually
already be on the tax return. The computer didn't find a specific
number on a specific line!
For example, a third party may
have turned in a 1099 on you for $7,000. On your tax return you may
have reported $8,900 on the income line because you had an
additional $1,900 of income from other sources that did not turn in
1099's on you. It's a simple matter to write a letter and explain
that the $7,000 is included in the $8,900 reported on line so and
so.
If your IRS Letter reads "CP:503,
504 or 505, these are Collections Notices. Each IRS letter in this
category sounds worse (more threatening) than the previous in
sequence. These are computer generated standard form letters. These
IRS letters will reference ACS which stands for Automated Collection
Service and you generally have about 30 days before they start
looking for bank accounts to levy (freeze) or wages to place a
garnishment on.
This article was written by:
Feel free to copy or reproduce
this article as long as you keep the author's name and link to his
website as stated.
My Research into Why the IRS is sending these letters to
taxpayers
After researching this I concluded that
taxpayers are likely to get the IRS letter related to
self-employment taxes if they reported any income on line 21 of the
Form 1040. The reason the IRS is sending these letters dates back to
September, 2000 when the Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration (TIGTA as it's known by its
IRS acronym), issued the following
report:
THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NEEDS
TO IMPROVE THE
IDENTIFICATION AND COLLECTION OF UNREPORTED
SELF-EMPLOYMENT TAXES
Executive Summary
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) could assess
and collect significant amounts of unreported self-employment taxes
each year before tax refunds are issued to taxpayers. We estimate
that over a 2-year period, taxpayers did not report $156 million in
self-employment taxes; over 61 percent of these taxpayers received
$51 million in tax refunds that could have been offset against the
unreported self-employment taxes.
The self-employment tax is a Social Security and
Medicare tax on the income of individuals who work for themselves.
Funding of Social Security and its long-term viability have received
considerable political attention in recent years.
Author: They are laying out
the reason (justification) for this program in that second sentence.
The General Accounting Office recently reported
that non-wage income has grown significantly since 1970 as a portion
of total individual income. The number of tax returns that included
self-employment income increased 138 percent from 1970 to 1990.
Self-employment income was the largest portion of non-wage income
included in the IRS’ inventory of tax debts at the end of Fiscal
Year 1993. Author
Comment: So based on these facts, TIGTA concluded that taxpayers
must have income that should be subject to self-employment tax, on
which they are not paying SE tax. This person or persons should be
fired, unfortunately they probably got a promotion and pay raise
(read on, it gets better).
In a 1998 report, Compliance with
Self-Employment Tax Requirements (Reference Number 083502, dated
May 19, 1998), the Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration (formerly IRS Internal Audit) recommended that the
IRS take steps to improve its process of administering
self-employment tax requirements. The objective of this audit was to
determine whether the IRS had taken effective corrective actions in
response to that report to improve the identification and collection
of unreported self-employment taxes.
Results
The IRS has taken some actions to address
unreported self-employment taxes. Changes were implemented to
the computer screening criteria used to identify tax returns with
unreported self-employment taxes. The IRS also developed an
educational letter which was sent to taxpayers filing these tax
returns, requesting the taxpayers to review their tax returns and
amend the returns by submitting Self-Employment Tax (Schedule SE) if
they deemed it necessary. This letter was sent well after the tax
returns had been processed.
Despite these efforts, significant amounts of
self-employment taxes remain unassessed and uncollected each year.
The IRS needs to take steps to further improve the identification
and collection of these taxes. The ongoing "stand up" of the IRS’
new Small Business/Self-Employed (SB/SE) Division presents an
excellent opportunity to address these issues.
The Internal Revenue Service Could More Timely
Identify and Collect Unreported Self-Employment Taxes
In our prior report, we recommended that the IRS
identify taxpayers owing self-employment taxes when returns are
processed and work those cases immediately in Correspondence
Examination. The IRS has not implemented those recommendations.
Author Comment: They still
haven't, because in the two cases I worked recently, the first was
on a 2005 tax return (The IRS sent the letter just before the
statute of limitations was about to expire) and the second was on a
2007 tax return.
Identifying unreported self-employment taxes as
tax returns are processed and assessing self-employment taxes on
those cases with available tax refunds would help the IRS:
- Comply with the desires of the United States
(U.S.) Congress for the IRS to promptly inform taxpayers of their
obligations with respect to tax deficiencies.
- Minimize the burden to some taxpayers of paying
self-employment taxes.
- Minimize the cost of collecting the taxes.
By assessing unreported self-employment taxes
before refunds are issued, the IRS could immediately collect
self-employment taxes of $21 million each year owed by 78,000
taxpayers with self-employment income of $2,000 or more.
Author Comment: I highly
suspect the accuracy of these estimates, but I do believe they could
send threatening, scary letters and get people to pay them $269
rather than fight! ($21,000,000 divided by 78,000 people = $269)
Actually what they are suggesting, is for the IRS to just go ahead
and deduct $269 from these peoples refunds (that's even better).
The Internal Revenue Service Needs to Reduce
Certain Processing Errors to Further Improve the Computerized
Identification of Unreported Self-Employment Taxes
The IRS
made processing errors on tax returns and related documents, which
caused its computers to erroneously identify some taxpayers as owing
self-employment taxes. An estimated 30,000 taxpayers were
erroneously identified in this way and sent self-employment tax
education letters. These taxpayers had
either: (1) claimed religious exemptions from self-employment tax
requirements, (2) reported "Other Income" on the U.S. Individual
Income Tax Return (Form 1040) line 21, or (3) indicated they were
statutory employees by checking the appropriate box on Profit or
Loss From Business (Schedule C).
Criteria for Prioritizing Self-Employment Tax
Cases Need to Be Revised to Accurately Reflect Potential Unreported
Self-Employment Taxes
The logic
of the IRS’ computer program to identify and prioritize tax returns
with unreported self-employment taxes is flawed. (NOTE: Author
strongly agrees) As a result, tax
returns with significantly varying amounts of unreported
self-employment taxes can receive the same priority in the IRS’
compliance program. This can lead to the ineffective use of scarce
Examination function resources.
Educational Letters to Taxpayers Potentially Owing
Self-Employment Taxes Could Be Improved
The educational letters sent to taxpayers
appearing to owe self-employment taxes should be more
specific and assertive, provide an explanation of the importance of
the self-employment tax, and explain to taxpayers what will happen
if they do not respond. If taxpayers are not convinced of the
importance of taking action in response to an IRS letter, many will
not respond. Author
comment: The IRS really took this part of the recommendation to
heart. Their new approach is to send an IRS letter that reads, "you
owe xxxx dollars, if you do not pay within xx days we may take
collection action, which might include contacting third parties
about you, freezing your bank account, contacting your employer to
garnish your wages, ...".
Future plans are to send letters to all taxpayers
with self-employment income of $2,000 or more that did not report
self-employment taxes. During the implementation of the
Self-Employment Tax National Strategy, letters were sent to all
taxpayers with self-employment income of $1,000 or more.
Letters to taxpayers with
less than $2,000 resulted in gross self-employment tax revenue of
approximately $3.3 million (Why do they only report the results
of the very small cases? See author comments below about this
project titled Self-Employment Tax National Strategy).
Although these cases individually may not warrant follow-up by the
IRS, they do warrant letters informing taxpayers of their
self-employment tax obligation.
Author: What they mean by
this statement is, we know we're picking on the little guy and it's
not a lot of money individually. Don't actually assign case workers
to this in order to really determine if they owe it or not (that
costs too much), try to limit your spending to one or two of the
scary letters that cost about $1 each to generate and send.
Summary of Recommendations
The IRS should identify unreported self-employment
taxes during returns processing and assess these taxes before
refunds are issued to taxpayers. To make this process more
effective, the IRS should improve the accuracy of the information
used to determine if taxpayers are liable for self-employment taxes.
This information relates to applications for exemptions from
self-employment taxes, income reported on line 21 of Form 1040, and
the statutory employee indicator on Schedule C. In addition, the IRS
should revise the formula for prioritizing self-employment tax cases
and should improve the educational letters sent to taxpayers
potentially owing self-employment taxes.
Author Comment: What they
mean by "improve the letter" is make it more threatening and scary,
and what they mean by "respond" is send a check. When you send
someone a payment stub with a dollar amount on it and a return
envelope for the payment, it is clear what response you are seeking.
Remember what they said above about "be more assertive...", "tell
them what will happen if they don't respond (send a check)"..."taxpayers may not respond
(send a check) if
they aren't convinced of the importance of taking action".
Management’s Response:
In January 2001, the IRS will begin identifying, via computer,
taxpayers with potential unreported self-employment taxes as the
returns are processed. A project to hold refunds of a limited number
of taxpayers who owe self-employment taxes will be tested. If the
project is successful and if resources are available, the project
will be expanded to all SB/SE Correspondence Examination sites by
2003. The IRS will forward copies of forms indicating taxpayers are
exempt from self-employment taxes to the area responsible for
processing that information to ensure that the applicable records
are updated. The IRS will revise instructions for Form 1040, line 21
and will revise returns processing instructions to improve the
accuracy of data indicating that taxpayers are statutory employees
and not liable for self-employment taxes. The IRS will also revise
the scoring formula used to identify and prioritize tax returns with
potential unpaid self-employment taxes and will make changes to
letters sent to taxpayers potentially owing self-employment taxes.
Author: We will test the
waters with computer generated IRS letters not people, because those
scary letters only cost a $1. And oh yes, we will make the letters
more threatening than they were in the past. Although these actions
will not improve the over-all correctness, fairness or service we
provide, if it brings in dollars, we will expand the project in the
future.
Office of Audit Comment:
While we agree that sending different letters to taxpayers based on
the amount of self-employment tax they owed would result in
different treatment of taxpayers, in our opinion, the differing
treatment is consistent with the way the IRS currently administers
taxes. The IRS takes different actions when processing tax returns
or when taking enforced collection actions based on the amount of
tax involved. Author: We
admit that we treat the guy who owes us $200 different from the guy
that owes $20,000. We can't go to the expense of having an IRS
employee actually look at a $200 case and take the time to determine
if it's right or wrong (that would cost more than we collect). We don't think there's anything wrong with this
approach
and we will continue to operate in this fashion. The more money the
taxpayer owes us, the more likely he can afford a representative to fight us
or simply, the more willing he may be to defend himself. END OF TIGTA REPORT
AUTHOR
COMMENTS: Now you may say, "that report was issued nine
years ago"! My response, "The wheels of big government do turn
slow". Trust me, this report started the ball rolling and as long as
the IRS collects additional revenues from sending out these letters,
they will continue to do so (like a snowball rolling downhill).
The IRS likes to talk about the "Tax Gap", the
term they use to describe the amount of taxes that go uncollected
each year because our tax system relies somewhat on "voluntary
reporting". They never talk about what I like to refer to as "IRS
Donations", the money that people send the government in the form of
taxes that they really don't owe.
If the IRS collected $3,300,000 by sending letters
to taxpayers that had more than $1,000 but less than $2,000 in
miscellaneous income reported on their tax returns, I conclude the
following: Average Dollar Amount of Miscellaneous Income = $1,500
(may not be the mean, but I'm using it) x .9235 x .153 = $211.94 in
Self-Employment Tax, plus $52.99 in interest and penalties = $264.93
Average Collected from each Taxpayer. $3,300,000 divided by $264.93
= 12,456 Affected Taxpayers.
I further conclude that it was less expensive to
these 12,456 people to just send the government a check for $264.93
than fight it! Some people will fight, just as a matter of
principle, but the majority won't. It's the same reason that
frivolous lawsuits are settled all the time, economics and
aggravation factor. Would you rather quietly write a check for
$264.93 from the comfort of your home or office, or hire an
attorney, CPA or Enrolled Agent and pay them more money, spend hours
of your time, incur additional out-of-pocket expense and possibly
suffer public humiliation and embarrassment?
The one thing this report failed to tell us was,
how many letters were sent. I would be willing to bet that many of
those people that received the IRS letters had won a prize or award,
i.e., from a radio station, charity give away, etc. and did not
really owe the money.
I even speculate that many taxpayers had reported
an item as miscellaneous income that they really weren't required to
report, therefore, they didn't even owe income tax to begin with,
much less self-employment tax. The really sad part of this story is
this. The IRS did not dedicate the resources to have a human being
follow up with these taxpayers to ascertain if they really owed the
$264.93. If a taxpayer got an IRS letter and sent in a check to the
IRS, the IRS cashed the check and in most cases didn't even send any
computer generated thank you note or acknowledgement!
In conclusion, the IRS should become simply IR.
Drop the word "Service" from their name because it just don't apply.
If they want to keep the word "Service" in the name, then dedicate
the resources to be fair to the citizens when you undertake a
project like this and don't measure the success of such a project by
how much it cost versus how much money you collect. The true measure
of success should be whether they collect the correct amount of tax.
Of course, "doing the right thing" often costs
more. Training IRS personnel to know when self-employment should be
collected and not requires, well, training (time and money). Assigning those personnel to
look at each of these 12,456 cases is more expensive than just
letting the computer spew letters and forget about it.
I will tell you with confidence, why the IRS
conducted this program with their computer instead of people; 1)
they would not have collected $3.3 million if they did it the right
way, 2) it would have cost the government more money than they would
have collected if they did it fair (man hours, telephone, follow-up postage,
etc) and 3) Finally and Most Importantly, they choose the "easy way"
to conduct their tests (it's less costly) then use the bogus results
of their test to further pursue an incorrect conclusion in the
future.
Just because the computer generated a certain
number of threatening, scary letters and the government collected
$3.3 million dollars, they conclude taxpayers are under-reporting
and underpaying self-employment tax. Want to make this system really
fair? Make the IRS pay for the taxpayers representation and
associated expense when the IRS loses a case. If they had to weigh
that possible expense in these testing programs they would not undertake such
frivolous projects.
This program won't get much if any national
attention. Why? Because it affects too few people. After all, what
are 12,456 casualties? In the two cases that brought this to my
attention, the first taxpayer had prepared his own return. My firm
actually prepared the return in case #2, one letter out of
approximately 3,000 returns we prepared that year.
I have to make one final statement about
the "implementation of the SET National Strategy
program". The federal government could send a threatening, scary IRS
letter to taxpayers informing them of a "problem with line 77 of
their Form 1040" (the Form 1040 only has 76 lines), give the
taxpayer the option of fighting or paying less than $300 for this
problem to go away, and guess what? That's right, the IRS will
collect millions of dollars, which will prove that there in fact was
a problem with line 77 of the 1040 and that their new program
entitled "Line 77 Slot Machine Jackpot" was a huge success and
should be expanded to include Line 78 next year!
This article was written by:
Feel free to copy or reproduce
this article as long as you keep the author's name and link to his
website as stated.
|